U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. John Boyd, Jr.

United States v. John Boyd, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 6, 2011

United States v. John Boyd, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6249

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN LEE BOYD, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:93-cr-00123-F-3)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to file supplemental objections to the presentence investigation report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boyd, No. 5:93-cr-00123-F-3 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2011). We deny as unnecessary Boyd’s motion for a certificate of appealability.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.