U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Sheridan Glaze v. Rueben Greene

Sheridan Glaze v. Rueben Greene
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 6, 2011

Sheridan Glaze v. Rueben Greene

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6478

SHERIDAN A. GLAZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RUEBEN VOLL GREENE, Attorney; DAVID LASSITER, JR., Attorney, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00286-LO-TRJ)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sheridan A. Glaze, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaze v. Greene, No. 1:11-cv-00286-LO-TRJ (E.D.

Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.