Scott Boger v. Gene Johnson
Scott Boger v. Gene Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6006
SCOTT M. BOGER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GENE M. JOHNSON; JOHN JABE; JOHN GARMAN; D. A. BRAXTON; S. W.
HOLLAR; LIEUTENANT S. L. SAMPSON; T. HOSTETTER; R. WILLIS; JANE DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2; JOHN DOE #3, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:10-cv-00194-sgw-mfu)
Submitted: June 23, 2011 Decided: July 7, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott M. Boger, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Scott M. Boger appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action and denying his motion to add a party and the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Boger v. Johnson, No. 7:10-cv-00194-sgw- mfu (W.D. Va. Dec. 15, 2010; Jan. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.