U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Orlando Diaz v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Orlando Diaz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 12, 2011

Orlando Diaz v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2297

ORLANDO C. DIAZ; BRENDA ARACELY CARRERA, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: July 7, 2011 Decided: July 12, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dustin W. Dyer, DYER IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Petitioners. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, R. Alexander Goring, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Orlando C. Diaz and his wife, Brenda Aracely Carrera, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2011) (setting forth standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Diaz (B.I.A.

Oct. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.