U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Bradley Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill

Bradley Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2011

Bradley Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6633

BRADLEY SHANE SHEPPARD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN OF FCI ESTILL, Respondent – Appellee, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (1:10-cv-03220-RMG)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Shane Sheppard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bradley Shane Sheppard, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sheppard v. Warden of FCI Estill, No. 1:10-cv-03220-RMG (D.S.C. Apr. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.