U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Sheridan Glaze v. Department of Defense

Sheridan Glaze v. Department of Defense
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2011

Sheridan Glaze v. Department of Defense

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6671

SHERIDAN A. GLAZE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; DEFENSE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION SERVICE, DCIS; TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY, TMA; PALMETTO GOVERNMENT BENEFITS ADMINISTRATORS, PGBA; INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM; SHARP HEALTH SYSTEMS, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00311-LO-JFA)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sheridan A. Glaze, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaze v. Department of Defense, No. 1:11-cv-00311-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.