U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Sekou Diaby v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Sekou Diaby v. Eric Holder, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 4, 2011

Sekou Diaby v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2325

SEKOU DIABY, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted: July 18, 2011 Decided: August 4, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Susan Houser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Marion E. Guyton, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sekou Diaby, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his third motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Diaby’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diaby, (B.I.A. Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.