Ronald Childress v. United States
Ronald Childress v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2408
RONALD M. CHILDRESS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-03922-RJC)
Submitted: October 7, 2010 Decided: August 10, 2011
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everett J. Mercer, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellant.
William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ronald M. Childress appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss his claims against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Childress v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-03922-RJC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.