U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Rosemary Susko v. City of Weirton

Rosemary Susko v. City of Weirton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 18, 2011

Rosemary Susko v. City of Weirton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1114

ROSEMARY SUSKO, d/b/a Rosemont Manor, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CITY OF WEIRTON; MARK HARRIS; WILLIAM MILLER; ROD ROSNICK; JIM MCHENRY; GARY DUFOUR; DEWEY GUIDA; TOM VIRTUE; BOB ARANGO; BOB MRVOS; ETHEL YEAGER, as Executrix of the Estate of John Yeager, deceased, substituted as a party in place of John Yeager, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN YEAGER, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:09-cv-00001-FPS-JES)

Submitted: August 10, 2011 Decided: August 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul J. Harris, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. David L. Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, P.L.L.C., Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Rosemary Susko appeals the district court’s judgment granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Susko v. City of Weirton, No. 5:09-cv-00001-FPS-JES (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.