U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Eugene Cunningham v. Warden FCI Bennettsville

Eugene Cunningham v. Warden FCI Bennettsville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 23, 2011

Eugene Cunningham v. Warden FCI Bennettsville

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6755

EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN FCI BENNETTSVILLE, Respondent – Appellee, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Municipal Incorporation, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (9:10-cv-02105-CMC)

Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Jerome Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cunningham v. Warden, No. 9:10-cv-02105- CMC (D.S.C. June 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.