U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Capital Funding and Consulting v. Patrick Becker

Capital Funding and Consulting v. Patrick Becker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 28, 2011

Capital Funding and Consulting v. Patrick Becker

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1063

CAPITAL FUNDING AND CONSULTING, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. PATRICK BECKER; SHERRIE BECKER, Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Kevin R. Huennekens, Bankruptcy Judge. (09-36086-KRH; 10-03004-KRH)

Submitted: September 19, 2011 Decided: September 28, 2011

Before WILKINSON, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Courtney Moates Paulk, Nathaniel L. Story, HIRSCHLER FLEISCHER, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. Loc Pfeiffer, Kimberly Pierro, KUTAK ROCK, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Patrick and Sherrie Becker appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order determining that the attachment of the Beckers’ judgment lien against Capital Funding and Consulting, LLC’s interests in various parcels of real property occurred within ninety days of the Debtor’s filing of the petition for relief in bankruptcy and therefore is avoidable by the debtor-in- possession as a preferential transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) (2006). Our review of the record and the briefs filed by the parties discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the bankruptcy court. Capital Funding & Consulting, LLC v. Becker, No. 09-36086-KRH (Bankr. E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.