UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7316

WAYNE VINSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; DAVID CRANEFORD; DEONTYE JOYNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (0:10-cv-00079-RMG)

Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 20, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Vinson, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Emery Clark, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wayne Vinson appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and

dismissing Vinson’s claims brought pursuant to the Federal Tort

Claims Act,

(b), 2671-2680 (2006), and

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics,

(1971). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Vinson v. U.S. Marshals

Service, No. 0:10-cv-00079-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2011). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2