U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Bernard Carl v. bernardjcarl.com

Bernard Carl v. bernardjcarl.com
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 7, 2011

Bernard Carl v. bernardjcarl.com

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1457

BERNARD J. CARL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BERNARDJCARL.COM; FABRICE MARCHISIO; COTTY VIVANT MARCHISIO & LAUZERAL, Defendants – Appellees, and NS HOLDING, INC., f/k/a Network Solutions, Incorporated; JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-01128-TSE-TRJ)

Submitted: August 19, 2011 Decided: September 7, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard J. Carl, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bernard J. Carl appeals the district court’s judgment awarding Carl $20,000 in punitive damages. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carl v. BernardJCarl.com, No. 1:07-cv-01128-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.