Charter Communications Vi, LLC v. Melvin Eleazer
Charter Communications Vi, LLC v. Melvin Eleazer
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1804
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, LLC, d/b/a Charter Communications; INTERLINK COMMUNICATIONS PARTNERS, LLC, d/b/a Charter Communications, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. MELVIN ELEAZER; MNE BROADCASTING, LLC, Defendants – Appellants, and WDRL-TV, INCORPORATED, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (5:04-cv-01204)
Submitted: August 31, 2011 Decided: September 9, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne L. Evans, KATZ, KANTOR & PERKINS, Bluefield, West Virginia, for Appellants. Adam S. Caldwell, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP, Washington, D.C.; J. Miles Morgan, ECKERT, SEAMANS, CHERIN & MELLOTT, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Melvin Eleazer and MNE Broadcasting, LLC, appeal from the district court’s orders denying their motion to set aside a default judgment and their motion for a continuance in the underlying civil action. We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no error in the district court’s orders. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Charter Commc’ns VI, LLC v. Eleazer, No. 5:04-cv-01204 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 8, 2009; June 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.