Sherman Thompson v. Officer Richardson
Sherman Thompson v. Officer Richardson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6124
SHERMAN A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. OFFICER RICHARDSON; TARACE CARSON, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03161-BO)
Submitted: August 30, 2011 Decided: September 9, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherman A. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Sherman A. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Richardson, No. 5:09-ct-03161-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2011). We deny Thompson’s motion to file an amended complaint and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.