U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Michael Moore v. James Bennette

Michael Moore v. James Bennette
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 16, 2011

Michael Moore v. James Bennette

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6581

MICHAEL WAYNE MOORE, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JAMES B. BENNETTE; GEORGE E. CURRIE; JOSEPH LIGHTSEY; RICHARD T. JONES; TONIA RODGERS, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:03-ct-00762-BO)

Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Wayne Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Wayne Moore appeals the district court’s judgment granting Defendants’ summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them and has moved for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment.

See Moore v. Bennette, No. 5:03-ct-00762-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.