United States v. Lennell Dyches
United States v. Lennell Dyches
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6649
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. LENNELL DYCHES, Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1)
Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lennell Dyches, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lennell Dyches appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion to supplement the record in his criminal matter, and his motion for stenographic notes from his criminal matter. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Dyches, No. 8:06-cr-00136-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.