U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Qihui Huang v. Philip Culpepper

Qihui Huang v. Philip Culpepper
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 21, 2011

Qihui Huang v. Philip Culpepper

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1452

QIHUI HUANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, and SHIELD OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND JUSTICE, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. PHILIP E. CULPEPPER, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:10-cv-00089-DKC)

Submitted: August 22, 2011 Decided: September 21, 2011

Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Qihui Huang, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Radding, Geoffrey W.

Washington, ADELBERG, RUDOW, DORF & HENDLER, LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Qihui Huang appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for an extension of time in which to file a second motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huang v. Culpepper, No. 8:10-cv-00089-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 20, 2011). We deny all of Huang’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.