U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Stephanie Ambush v. City of Frederick

Stephanie Ambush v. City of Frederick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2011

Stephanie Ambush v. City of Frederick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1192

STEPHANIE DAVIS AMBUSH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CITY OF FREDERICK, A Body Corporate and Politic; RANDY MCCLEMENT, Mayor, Frederick City Government, Individually and in his Official Capacity; RICHARD B. WELDON, JR., Individually and in his Official Capacity; KATHRYN NICOLATO, Individually and in her Official Capacity, Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:10-cv-01953-WDQ)

Submitted: September 12, 2011 Decided: September 26, 2011

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie J. Mahone, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Kevin M.

Kraham, Erik C. Johnson, LITTLER MENDELSON P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Stephanie Davis Ambush appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her various state and Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment procedural and substantive due process claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Ambush v. City of Frederick, No. 1:10-cv-01953-WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.