United States v. Michael Moore
United States v. Michael Moore
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6683
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. MICHAEL L. MOORE, a/k/a Gadget, Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1)
Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: September 29, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael L. Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Moore, No. 1:97-cr-00362-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.