UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1439

LAWRENCE F. GLASER, individually and on behalf of Kimberly, Erin, Hannah and Benjamin Glaser,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

MAUREEN GLASER, individually and on behalf of Kimberly, Erin, Hannah and Benjamin Glaser,

Plaintiff,

v.

ENZO BIOCHEM, INCORPORATED; HEIMAN GROSS; BARRY WEINER; ELAZAR RABBANI; SHARIM RABBANI; JOHN DELUCCA; DEAN ENGELHARDT, Defendants - Appellees,

and

RICHARD KEATING; DOUG YATES; JOHN DOE, 1-50,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:02-cv-01242-GBL)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence F. Glaser, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Howard Chase, MORRISON & COHEN, LLP, New York, New York; Robert Richardson Vieth, COOLEY, GODWARD & KRONISH, LLP, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Lawrence F. Glaser appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60

and motion for sanctions, which were filed in his civil action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Glaser v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., No. 1:02-cv-01242-GBL

(E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3