T. Terell Bryan v. D. Tatarsky
T. Terell Bryan v. D. Tatarsky
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6539
T. TERELL BRYAN, a/k/a Terence Bryan, a/k/a Terence Terell Bryan,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
D. TATARSKY; OFC BUEHLER; IGC COCCIOLONE; MR. NAJJAR; ASST WARDEN CLAYTOR; WARDEN MCCALL; M. CAROLINA LINDSEY; JAMES SIMMONS, III,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SCDC; IGC,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03556-TLW)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in unpublished per curiam opinion. T. Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Bryan v. Tatarsky, No. 1:08-cv-03556-TLW (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2011).
We also deny Bryan’s pending motion to produce. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished