T. Terell Bryan v. D. Tatarsky

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

T. Terell Bryan v. D. Tatarsky

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6539

T. TERELL BRYAN, a/k/a Terence Bryan, a/k/a Terence Terell Bryan,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

D. TATARSKY; OFC BUEHLER; IGC COCCIOLONE; MR. NAJJAR; ASST WARDEN CLAYTOR; WARDEN MCCALL; M. CAROLINA LINDSEY; JAMES SIMMONS, III,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

SCDC; IGC,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03556-TLW)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in unpublished per curiam opinion. T. Terell Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and

granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Bryan v. Tatarsky, No. 1:08-cv-03556-TLW (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2011).

We also deny Bryan’s pending motion to produce. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished