Angelo Ham v. Jon Ozmint

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Angelo Ham v. Jon Ozmint

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6604

ANGELO B. HAM, a/k/a Angelo Bernard Ham,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JON OZMINT; ANTHONY J. PADULA; JOHN J. BROOKS; BRUCE OBERMAN; RONNIE CRIBB; DARRYL CAIN, Sergeant of SMU at L.C.I.; CHRISTOPHER GODFREY, Officer of SMU at L.C.I.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (6:10-cv-01095-DCN)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angelo B. Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Barry Johnson, G. Murrell Smith, Jr., LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angelo B. Ham appeals the denial of his motions to

appoint counsel and to compel discovery and the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Ham v. Ozmint, No. 6:10-cv-01095-DCN (D.S.C. May 14,

2010; Nov. 1, 2010; Jan 26, 2011 & Apr. 25, 2011). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished