U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Jonathan Ojeda v. Dr. Procter

Jonathan Ojeda v. Dr. Procter
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 7, 2011

Jonathan Ojeda v. Dr. Procter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6801

JONATHAN OJEDA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. PROCTER, sued individually and as an Agent of Wexford Medical Sources; TRISTEN TENNY, sued individually and as Agent of Wexford Medical Resources; ADRIAN HOKE, sued individually and in his Official Capacity; WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES, sued as a Corporation, working within the State of West Virginia, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00126-JPB-DJJ)

Submitted: September 13, 2011 Decided: October 7, 2011

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Ojeda, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Cameron Petty, ROSE PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellees Procter and Tenny.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jonathan Ojeda appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Ojeda v. Procter, No. 2:10-cv-00126-JPB-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. June 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.