Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Eric Shinseki

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Nathaniel Costley, Sr. v. Eric Shinseki

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1558

NATHANIEL M. COSTLEY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; LISA DOYLE; MELISSA STARINSKY, Academy; HAROLD MCALDUFF, Price Waterhouse Cooper; DANIEL JACOBS, The Federal Marketing Group,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:10-cv-03122-JKB)

Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Amy Bess, VEDDER PRICE, PC, Washington, D.C.; Geoffrey P. Gitner, LAW OFFICES OF GEOFFREY P. GITNER, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel M. Costley, Sr., appeals the district

court’s orders granting judgment in favor of Defendants in his

employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Costley v. Shinseki, No.

1:10-cv-03122-JKB (D. Md. Feb. 7 & May 6, 2011). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished