Romaine Francis v. C. T. Woody

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Romaine Francis v. C. T. Woody

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6959

ROMAINE FRANCIS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

C. T. WOODY, Sheriff, in his capacity as Sheriff for the City of Richmond; SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND; ANDERSON, Medical Worker; ROBERTSON, Captain of the City of Richmond Sheriff's Department,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

STANLEY NELSON FURMAN, Doctor,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00235-REP)

Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Romaine Francis, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, William Daniel Prince, THOMPSON MCMULLAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Romaine Francis appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody, No.

3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished