U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Darryl El v. Max Daetwyler Corporation

Darryl El v. Max Daetwyler Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2011

Darryl El v. Max Daetwyler Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1555

DARRYL EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAX DAETWYLER CORPORATION; DON BERGHOLZ; WALTER SIEGENTHALER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:09-cv-00415-MOC-DCK)

Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: October 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl El, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Pearson Holderness, ROBINSON, BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Darryl El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. El v. Max Daetwyler Corp., No. 3:09-cv- 00415-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. May 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.