United States v. Michael Thompson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Michael Thompson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6619

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL J. THOMPSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1)

Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: October 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Riley Pedersen, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Thompson appeals the district court’s order

denying as moot his self-styled “Request for an Order on Final

Disposition on Petitioner’s Reply to Government’s Motion

Regarding Motion for Modification.” We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. See United States v. Thompson, No.

1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 12, 2011; entered Apr.

13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished