George Pinanko v. Janet Napolitano

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

George Pinanko v. Janet Napolitano

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1169

GEORGE OSAM PINANKO; STELLA OPOKU,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; SARAH TAYLOR, Director, Washington District Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: October 12, 2011 Decided: October 21, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Anna E. Cross, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Osam Pinanko and Stella Opoku appeal the

district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their Petition

for Writ of Mandamus or for Review of Agency Action under the

Administrative Procedure Act. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Pinanko v.

Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished