George Pinanko v. Janet Napolitano
George Pinanko v. Janet Napolitano
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1169
GEORGE OSAM PINANKO; STELLA OPOKU,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; SARAH TAYLOR, Director, Washington District Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ)
Submitted: October 12, 2011 Decided: October 21, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States Attorney, Anna E. Cross, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
George Osam Pinanko and Stella Opoku appeal the
district court’s order dismissing with prejudice their Petition
for Writ of Mandamus or for Review of Agency Action under the
Administrative Procedure Act. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Pinanko v.
Napolitano, No. 1:10-cv-01138-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished