United States v. Glenn Williams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Glenn Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6797

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GLENN WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:95-cr-00136-F-3)

Submitted: October 12, 2011 Decided: October 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Glenn Williams appeals the district court’s orders

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence and denying his subsequent motions for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of

Williams’ § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Williams, No. 5:95-cr-00136-F-

3 (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2011). Because the district court lacked

the authority to consider Williams’ motions for reconsideration,

see United States v. Goodwyn,

596 F.3d 233, 235-36

(4th Cir.),

cert. denied,

130 S. Ct. 3530

(2010), we affirm the district

court’s orders denying the motions. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished