United States v. Glenn Williams
United States v. Glenn Williams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6797
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GLENN WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:95-cr-00136-F-3)
Submitted: October 12, 2011 Decided: October 21, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Glenn Williams appeals the district court’s orders
denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence and denying his subsequent motions for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of
Williams’ § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Williams, No. 5:95-cr-00136-F-
3 (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2011). Because the district court lacked
the authority to consider Williams’ motions for reconsideration,
see United States v. Goodwyn,
596 F.3d 233, 235-36(4th Cir.),
cert. denied,
130 S. Ct. 3530(2010), we affirm the district
court’s orders denying the motions. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished