Ronnie Ore v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ronnie Ore v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1660

RONNIE ORE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:11-cv-00244-RGD-FBS)

Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Ore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Ore appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915

(e) (West Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Ore v. Hampton Rds.

Reg’l Jail, No. 2:11-cv-00244-RGD-FBS (E.D. Va. June 9, 2011).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished