William Sommerville v. Jody Dobson
William Sommerville v. Jody Dobson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1334
WILLIAM SOMMERVILLE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JODY DOBSON, Officer; JAMES LEDBETTER, Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. (4:10-cv-00067-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: October 25, 2011 Decided: November 2, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd M. Gaynor, TAYLOR & WALKER, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, Attorney General of Virginia, E. Duncan Getchell, Solicitor General of Virginia, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, Catherine Crooks Hill, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Jeff W. Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Sommerville appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Sommerville v. Dobson, No. 4:10-cv-00067-JBF-FBS (E.D.
Va. Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished