United States v. Lino Haynes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Lino Haynes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6114

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LINO H. HAYNES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: November 3, 2011

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lino H. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Lino H. Haynes appeals the district court’s order

denying his “motion to vacate judgment” pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b), which Haynes attempted to file in his criminal case.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Haynes, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1

(E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 22, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished