United States v. Anthony Merrick

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Anthony Merrick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6438

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY MERRICK, a/k/a “C”,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:94-cr-00163-RBS-19)

Submitted: October 19, 2011 Decided: November 3, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Merrick, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Merrick appeals the district court’s orders:

denying his motion seeking relief under the Fair Sentencing Act

of 2010; and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Merrick, No. 2:94-cr-00163-RBS-19 (E.D. Va. Feb. 3 &

Mar. 7, 2011). * We deny the motion to place this case in

abeyance and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* We recently held that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 does not apply retroactively to defendants sentenced prior to August 3, 2010, the effective date of the Act. United States v. Bullard,

645 F.3d 237

(4th Cir. 2011). Merrick is such a defendant.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished