U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Owen Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.

Owen Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 16, 2011

Owen Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2375

OWEN HARTY, Individually, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LUIHN FOUR, INC., a Domestic Corporation, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00107-BO)

Submitted: October 20, 2011 Decided: November 16, 2011

Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pete Monismith, THOMAS B. BACON, P.A., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Thomas B. Bacon, THOMAS B. BACON, P.A., Cooper City, Florida, for Appellant. Richard S. McAtee, Paul S. Holscher, JACKSON LEWIS LLP, Cary, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Owen Harty appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2010; Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.