U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Michael Stephens v. Gary Kubic

Michael Stephens v. Gary Kubic
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 17, 2011 · Niemeyer, Keenan, Hamilton
453 F. App'x 362

Michael Stephens v. Gary Kubic

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Stephens appeals the district court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), (d) motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Stephens v. Kubic, No. 4:08-cv-00329-CMC (D.S.C. May 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.