Norman Mayes v. John Rowley
Norman Mayes v. John Rowley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6840
NORMAN LINDSEY MAYES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN ROWLEY, Warden; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01308-CCB)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman Lindsey Mayes, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Norman Lindsey Mayes appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm. We agree with the district court that Mayes was
afforded sufficient due process. Mayes v. Rowley, No. 1:10-cv-
01308-CCB (D. Md. May 12, 2011; June 1, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished