Norman Mayes v. John Rowley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Norman Mayes v. John Rowley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6840

NORMAN LINDSEY MAYES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN ROWLEY, Warden; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01308-CCB)

Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Lindsey Mayes, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Norman Lindsey Mayes appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint

and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm. We agree with the district court that Mayes was

afforded sufficient due process. Mayes v. Rowley, No. 1:10-cv-

01308-CCB (D. Md. May 12, 2011; June 1, 2011). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished