Anthony McCoy v. Stokes
Anthony McCoy v. Stokes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6889
ANTHONY JO-ALLEN MCCOY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STOKES, Correctional Officer,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00868-JRS)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McCoy v. Stokes, No. 3:10-cv-00868-JRS (E.D. Va. June
29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished