Jacob Peyton v. J. Carico

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jacob Peyton v. J. Carico

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6720

JACOB D. PEYTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. CARICO, Sergeant; R. ROBINSON,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

BRYAN WATSON; HARVEY; C/O ROBERTS; SCARBERRY,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00492-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: October 31, 2011 Decided: November 29, 2011

Before KING, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacob D. Peyton, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jacob D. Peyton appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on Peyton’s excessive force claim in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Peyton v. Carico, No. 7:09-cv-00492-JPJ-

PMS (W.D. Va. May 20, 2011). We further deny Peyton’s motion

for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished