Jacob Peyton v. J. Carico
Jacob Peyton v. J. Carico
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6720
JACOB D. PEYTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. CARICO, Sergeant; R. ROBINSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BRYAN WATSON; HARVEY; C/O ROBERTS; SCARBERRY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00492-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: October 31, 2011 Decided: November 29, 2011
Before KING, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacob D. Peyton, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jacob D. Peyton appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on Peyton’s excessive force claim in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Peyton v. Carico, No. 7:09-cv-00492-JPJ-
PMS (W.D. Va. May 20, 2011). We further deny Peyton’s motion
for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished