James Robinson v. Henry King
James Robinson v. Henry King
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1216
JAMES K. ROBINSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HENRY L. KING, M.D.; MDA HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a Medical Doctor Associates,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant/Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00418-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: October 6, 2011 Decided: December 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judith M. Cofield, JM COFIELD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Joseph M. Rainsbury, LECLAIRRYAN, Roanoke, Virginia; Ronald P. Herbert, Alexander K. Page, Ashley C. Dobbin, LECLAIRRYAN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
James K. Robinson appeals the district court’s orders
granting the Appellees’ motion in limine to exclude Robinson’s
experts, granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on
Robinson’s claims of medical malpractice, and denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Robinson v. King, No. 2:09-cv-
00418-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 29 & Nov. 12, 2010; Feb. 3, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished