Nathan Groves v. City of Darlington Sc
Nathan Groves v. City of Darlington Sc
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1298
NATHAN ANDREW GROVES; JOEL STROUD,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
DARLINGTON SOUTH CAROLINA, THE CITY OF,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00402-TLW)
Submitted: November 9, 2011 Decided: December 8, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joel F. Stroud, JOEL F. STROUD, Chesterfield, South Carolina, for Appellants. J. Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
The Appellants, Nathan Andrew Groves and Joel Flake
Stroud, appeal the district court’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary
judgment in favor of the Appellee and rendering the Appellee’s
pending motions moot, and the magistrate judge’s order denying
the Appellants’ motion to transfer the case to another division
of the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
and magistrate judge’s orders. We also deny the Appellants’
motion to expedite the decision as moot. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished