U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Nathan Groves v. City of Darlington Sc

Nathan Groves v. City of Darlington Sc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 8, 2011

Nathan Groves v. City of Darlington Sc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1298

NATHAN ANDREW GROVES; JOEL STROUD, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. DARLINGTON SOUTH CAROLINA, THE CITY OF, Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00402-TLW)

Submitted: November 9, 2011 Decided: December 8, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joel F. Stroud, JOEL F. STROUD, Chesterfield, South Carolina, for Appellants. J. Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX, BUYCK & WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: The Appellants, Nathan Andrew Groves and Joel Flake Stroud, appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee and rendering the Appellee’s pending motions moot, and the magistrate judge’s order denying the Appellants’ motion to transfer the case to another division of the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s and magistrate judge’s orders. We also deny the Appellants’ motion to expedite the decision as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.