UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6744

EDWARD E. POOLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CARTERET COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; ACEA BUCK, Sheriff; DETECTIVE COOPER; J. JOHNSON, Deputy; DETECTIVE PHIFER; J. PITTMAN, Detective; J. WILLIS, Detective; TRAVIS SANDERSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-7314

EDWARD E. POOLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CARTERET COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; ACEA BUCK, Sheriff; DETECTIVE COOPER; J. JOHNSON, Deputy; DETECTIVE PHIFER; J. PITTMAN, Detective; J. WILLIS, Detective; TRAVIS SANDERSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03215-BO)

Submitted: November 28, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward E. Poole, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Edward E. Poole appeals

the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights

complaint as frivolous and denying his motion filed under Fed.

R. Civ. P. 59. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Poole failed to state a claim that the

Defendants violated his constitutional rights. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Poole v.

Carteret Cnty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. 5:10-ct-03215-BO (E.D.N.C.

May 10, 2011; July 15, 2011). We also deny Poole’s motion for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3