Donald Teague v. Patricia Meredith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Donald Teague v. Patricia Meredith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1866

DONALD B. TEAGUE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA MEREDITH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00039-RLV-DCK)

Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald B. Teague, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald B. Teague appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant in Teague’s civil action.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Teague’s

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district

court’s disposition, Teague has forfeited appellate review of

the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished