Michael Sindram v. Douglas Robelen
Michael Sindram v. Douglas Robelen
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-2005
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DOUGLAS B. ROBELEN, State Actor; GERALD BRUCE LEE; PHYLLIS T. WALTON; LISA GRAYSON; U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE; JOHN HACKMAN, Defendants – Appellees, and PATRICIA L. HARRINGTON, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD)
Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order enjoining him from filing further civil actions in the district court without receiving pre-filing authorization. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.