Donald Penrod v. Don Quick
Donald Penrod v. Don Quick
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6967
DONALD ADAM PENROD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DON QUICK, Adams County District Attorney; CAROL CHAMBERS, Arapahoe County District Attorney, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:11-hc-02012-D)
Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Adam Penrod, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Donald Adam Penrod appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Independent Action to Enjoin a Void Judgment Procured by Gross ‘Fraud on the Court.’” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Penrod v. Quick, No. 5:11-hc-02012-D (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.