U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Donald Penrod v. Don Quick

Donald Penrod v. Don Quick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2011

Donald Penrod v. Don Quick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6967

DONALD ADAM PENROD, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DON QUICK, Adams County District Attorney; CAROL CHAMBERS, Arapahoe County District Attorney, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:11-hc-02012-D)

Submitted: December 15, 2011 Decided: December 19, 2011

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Adam Penrod, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Donald Adam Penrod appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Independent Action to Enjoin a Void Judgment Procured by Gross ‘Fraud on the Court.’” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Penrod v. Quick, No. 5:11-hc-02012-D (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.