U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Ibrahim Jabbar v. C. Woody

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2011 · Motz, Duncan, Diaz

459 F. App'x 279

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ibrahim Abdullah Jabbar appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jabbar v. Woody, No. 1:09-cv-00246-TSE-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 29, 2009 & entered Sept. 30, 2009); 2010 WL 3671155 (filed Sept. 9, 2010 & entered Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are *280 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jabbar filed an untimely notice of appeal. This court subsequently remanded this case to the district court for a determination as to whether Jabbar was entitled to a reopening of the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). See Jabbar v. Woody, 432 Fed.Appx. 224 (4th Cir. 2011) (unpublished). Because the district court found that Jabbar is entitled to the benefit of Rule 4(a)(6), we address the appeal on the merits.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.