Ronnie Dyson v. Flora's All Tune and Lube
Ronnie Dyson v. Flora's All Tune and Lube
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1582
RONNIE DYSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FLORA'S ALL TUNE AND LUBE; ALL TUNE AND LUBE; O'SHEA, INCORPORATED; ALL TUNE AND LUBE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00667-JRS)
Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Dyson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Arthur Gavin, CAWTHORN, PICARD, ROWE, DESKEVICH & GAVIN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Dyson appeals the district court's order
granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss
his complaint against them. On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in Dyson’s informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). Because Dyson’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Dyson has forfeited
appellate review of the district court's order. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court's order. Dyson v. Flora’s All Tune &
Lube, No. 3:10-cv-00667-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished