Ronnie Dyson v. Flora's All Tune and Lube

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ronnie Dyson v. Flora's All Tune and Lube

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1582

RONNIE DYSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FLORA'S ALL TUNE AND LUBE; ALL TUNE AND LUBE; O'SHEA, INCORPORATED; ALL TUNE AND LUBE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00667-JRS)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Dyson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Arthur Gavin, CAWTHORN, PICARD, ROWE, DESKEVICH & GAVIN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Dyson appeals the district court's order

granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss

his complaint against them. On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in Dyson’s informal brief. See 4th Cir. R.

34(b). Because Dyson’s informal brief does not challenge the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Dyson has forfeited

appellate review of the district court's order. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court's order. Dyson v. Flora’s All Tune &

Lube, No. 3:10-cv-00667-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2011). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished