UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1586

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Tennessee corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEMETRICE E. DOUGLAS,

Defendant – Appellee,

v.

CHARLES H. VENEY; LEVERNIA HALL,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:10-cv-00542-MHL)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janipher W. Robinson, ROBINSON & GREENE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. A. Davis Bugg, Jr., RUMSEY & BUGG, P.C., Irvington, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the magistrate judge’s * order denying

their summary judgment motion and granting Appellee’s summary

judgment motion on Appellants’ claims seeking recovery of life

insurance proceeds. Limiting our review to the issues raised in

Appellants’ opening brief, see IGEN Int’l, Inc. v. Roche

Diagnostics GmbH,

, 308 (4th Cir. 2003); Edwards v.

City of Goldsboro,

, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir. 1999), we

have found no reversible error and affirm the magistrate judge’s

order. See Douglas v. Veney, No. 3:10-cv-00542-MHL (E.D. Va.

April 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, pursuant to

(c) (2006).

2