Ern Reynolds v. City of Roanoke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ern Reynolds v. City of Roanoke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1803

ERN REYNOLDS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF ROANOKE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00260-JCT)

Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011

Before KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ern Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Collins, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ern Reynolds appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his action alleging various constitutional violations

with respect to application of zoning ordinances and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Reynolds v. City of

Roanoke, No. 7:10-cv-00260-JCT (W.D. Va. July 13, 2011; July 19,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished